Legal Opinion

Costanzo v. Plain Dealer Publishing Co.

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided June 27, 1989No. Civ. A. No. 1:89CV0345Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

ANN ALDRICH, District Judge.

Frank and Patricia Costanzo bring this action against the Plain Dealer Publishing Co. for wrongful discharge, breach of contract, loss of consortium and punitive damages. Pending before the Court are the Plain Dealer’s motions to dismiss the complaint or, in the alternative, for summary judgment, and for sanctions pursuant to Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The Costanzos oppose the disposi-tive motion and the sanctions motion, and have filed their own motion for Rule 11 sanctions. Upon consideration and for the reasons that…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Hughes v. RoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API