Mirina Corp. v. Marina Biotech
District Court, W.D. Washington
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
RICHARD A. JONES, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
This matter comes before the court on Plaintiffs motion for preliminary injunction (Dkt. # 33). The court has considered the parties’ briefing and supporting evidence, and has heard from the parties at oral argument. For the reasons explained below, the court DENIES the motion (Dkt. # 33).
Because this order “grant[s] or den[ies] an interlocutory injunction,” the court must make findings and fact and conclusions of law. Fed.R.Civ.P. 52(a)(2). The court includes its findings and conclusions in this order, which serves as a memorandum of the…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Alliance for Wild Rockies v. CottrellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Amf Incorporated, a Corporation v. Sleekcraft Boats, a Sole Proprietorship, and Bruce E. Nescher, an IndividualCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- Stormans, Inc. v. SeleckyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Brookfield Communications, Inc. v. West Coast Entertainment CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Amazon.com Inc v. MoyerDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2019
- JTH Tax LLC v. McHughDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2020