State v. Piatnitsky
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
González, J.
f 1 We are asked today to decide whether Samuel Piatnitsky unequivocally invoked his right to remain silent when he told police investigating a murder that “I don’t want to talk right now” but that he would “write it down.” We find that this is, at best, an equivocal invocation of the right to remain silent, and thus, the trial judge did not err in admitting Piatnitsky’s written confession. We affirm.
FACTS
¶2 In the early hours of October 19, 2008, Samuel Piatnitsky and his friend Jason Young were asked to leave a party. They refused. A fight broke out, and eventually Piatnitsky…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Berghuis v. ThompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Smith v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- State v. I.B.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2015
- State Of Washington v. Anthony Edward BallentineCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018
- State Of Washington v. B.j.c.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2015
- State Of Washington v. Jose Jonael Ayala ReyesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020
- State Of Washington v. K.l.o.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2021
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.