Legal Opinion
Arey v. George Associates, Inc.
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided December 28, 1937PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtQua, J.
By this bill in equity the plaintiff seeks (1) To compel the defendant corporation to account to the plaintiff for a balance alleged to be due him as his share of commissions for managerial services rendered under a contract with the corporation by the terms of which the commissions were to be calculated annually upon the net earnings of the corporation, without deduction for certain taxes, but after deducting eight per cent on the invested capital and surplus, and (2) To compel the individual defendants to pay to the plaintiff such sums as might be found due him in default of payment by the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Lyons v. ElstonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
- Zuckernik v. Jordan Marsh Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
- Carter v. SullivanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
- Kendall v. KingsleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1876
- Winchester v. GlazierMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1890
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Foot v. BaumanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1955
- Attorney General v. Trustees of Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
- F. A. Bartlett Tree Expert Co. v. HartneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
- O'Brien v. Director of the Division of Employment SecurityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
- Crystal Concrete Corp. v. Town of BraintreeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.