Legal Opinion

Fruit Co. v. City of Dalton

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided April 14, 1937No. 11646PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bell, Justice.

The Fruit Company, a corporation of Floyd Coiinty, filed a suit against the City of Dalton and W. II. Souther as marshal of the City of Dalton, alleging substantially the following: The plaintiff is engaged in the wholesale produce and beer business, having its sole office and place of business in Rome, Georgia. In the operation of its business as a wholesale beer distributor, the plaintiff covers the northwestern section of Georgia, and has a number of customers located throughout that ter*278ritory. The plaintiff has several customers who are dealers in beer, by retail, in the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Hewin v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  2. Southern Express Co. v. Rose Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1906
  3. Wofford Oil Co. v. City of BostonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1930
  4. Kimmel v. Mayor of AmericusSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
  5. Wilson v. City of EatontonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1935

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Gaissert v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
  2. C. D. Kenny Co. v. Town of BrevardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  3. City of Gainesville v. Georgia Crown Distributing Co. of Atlanta, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1973
  4. Gaissert v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1938
  5. Kirkpatrick v. City of ConyersCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1954

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API