Conservation Federation of Missouri v. Hanson
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
RONNIE L. WHITE, Judge.
Article IV, section 43 of Missouri’s constitution imposes a one-eighth of one percent sales tax, the proceeds of which are to be used by the State conservation commission for the purpose of conserving Missouri’s natural heritage. The trial court declared that these conservation sales tax proceeds were included in “Total State Revenues” for the purposes of calculating the state taxation and spending ceilings under the Hancock Amendment,1 and that the monies set aside for conservation purposes by article IV, section 43(b) were available to the General Assembly to make the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Buchanan v. KirkpatrickSupreme Court of Missouri · 1981
- Buechner v. BondSupreme Court of Missouri · 1983
- Savannah R-III School District v. Public School Retirement SystemSupreme Court of Missouri · 1997
- Kelly v. HansonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1998
- Community Title Co. v. Stewart Title Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1998
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Missouri Ass'n of Counties v. WilsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1999
- Missouri Merchants & Manufacturers Ass'n v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2001
- Swallow Tail, LLC v. Missouri Department of ConservationMissouri Court of Appeals · 2017
- Conservation Commission and Missouri Department of Conservation v. Andrew Bailey, in his Official Capacity as Attorney General of Missouri, and Ken Zellers, in his Official Capacity as Commissioner of the Office of AdministrationSupreme Court of Missouri · 2023