Legal Opinion
Boston Casualty Co. v. Bath Iron Works Corp.
District Court, D. Maine
Decided November 21, 1942No. 106PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
PETERS, District Judge.
In this action the defendant is charged with wrongful interference with the business of the plaintiff. The defendant has filed a motion to dismiss the complaint on the ground that it fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Civil Procedure Rules, rule 12(b)- (6), 28 U.S. C.A. following section 723c.
After sifting out conclusions and characterizations, the residue of facts alleged upon which the complaint is based and which can be taken as provable for the purpose of this motion seems to be as follows: The plaintiff, Boston Casualty Company, is in…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Leimer v. State Mut. Life Assur. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1940
- Perkins v. PendletonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1897
- Sidney Blumenthal & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1929
- Taylor v. PrattSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1937
3Cited by1 opinion
- April Productions, Inc. v. Strand Enterprises, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1948