Legal Opinion

Hartnett v. Boston Store

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 9, 1914No. Gen. No. 18,804PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error to the Superior Court of Cook County; the Hon. Albert C. Barnes, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice MoSurely

Plaintiff in error seeks to have reversed a-judgment for the defendant on a directed verdict in an action brought to recover damages for injuries caused, as alleged, by the sale of a gun by the defendant to a minor, contrary to the provisions of a city ordinance, which forbids under penalty the sale of firearms to minors.

The declaration sets out á .municipal ordinance of the city of Chicago, which provides that “no person shall sell, loan or furnish to any minor, any gun, pistol or other firearm,” and that defendant negligently and carelessly, and in violation of the ordinance, sold a gun to…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Seith v. Commonwealth Electric Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Gibson v. LeonardIllinois Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Binford v. JohnstonIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  4. Chicago & Alton Railroad v. ClausenIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Loftus v. DehailCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Semeniuk v. ChentisAppellate Court of Illinois · 1954
  2. Key West Electric Co. v. AlburySupreme Court of Florida · 1926
  3. Kos v. Catholic BishopAppellate Court of Illinois · 1942
  4. Curran v. Chicago & Western Indiana RailroadAppellate Court of Illinois · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API