Legal Opinion

AlliedSignal Inc. v. Blue Cross of California

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided April 29, 1996No. Civ. A. 95-2931 (JCL)PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

LIFLAND, District Judge.

Blue Cross of California (“BCCA”) moves to dismiss AlliedSignal Inc.’s (“AlliedSignal’s”) Complaint for lack of personal jurisdiction pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(2). BCCA contends that even under the Employee Retirement Income . Security Act’s (“ERISA’s”) nationwide service of process provision, the Fifth Amendment’s Due Process clause requires satisfaction of the criteria set forth in International Shoe Co. v. Washington, 326 U.S. 310, 66 S.Ct. 154, 90 L.Ed. 95 (1945), essentially that BCCA have sufficient minimum contacts with New Jersey such…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Milliken v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  4. Stafford v. BriggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Texas Trading & Milling Corp. v. Federal Republic of NigeriaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. In Re: Automotive Refinishing Paint Antitrust Litigation Basf Ag and Basf Coatings AgCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
  2. Green v. William Mason & Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1998
  3. Board of Trustees, Sheet Metal Workers' National Pension Fund v. McD Metals, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1997
  4. Emerson Elec. Co. v. Le Carbone Lorraine, SADistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2007
  5. Snowstorm Acquisition Corp. v. Tecumseh Products Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 2010

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API