Legal Opinion
Karstetter v. Cardwell
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided May 29, 1975No. Civ. 74-532 Phx. WPCPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
COPPLE, District Judge.
Habeas petitioner Karstetter has moved this Court for an order nunc pro tunc approving the filing of his notice of appeal on January 30, 1975. The order appealed from was entered on December 3, 1974. Counsel for petitioner has advanced, as the reason for his delay in filing the notice, the fact that the majority of his practice “constitutes criminal matters wherein the United States is a party” and that he therefore mistakenly calendared sixty days “within which to appeal from the December 3rd judgment rather than thirty days.” Petitioner is…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Sanders v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- C-Thru Products, Inc. And Leon Laguerre v. Uniflex, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
- Herbert Reed v. People of the State of MichiganCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1968
- Emery H. Harlan, Dba East Bay Appliance Sales & Service Co. v. Graybar Electric Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
- United States v. Florio IsabellaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1958
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Jacqueline Selph v. Council of the City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- Andrew W. Pettibone v. Hoyt C. Cupp, Warden of Oregon State Penitentiary, and James A. Redden, Attorney General of the State of OregonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Hill v. Warden, Nevada State PrisonNevada Supreme Court · 1980
- Gilbert v. Suburban Athletic Club (In Re Dayton Circuit Courts 2)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 1988
- Mazzan v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1993
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.