Legal Opinion
Russell Tinsley v. Warden, et al.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided December 30, 2025No. 2:24-cv-09673Unknown
1Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY RUSSELL TINSLEY, Petitioner, Civil Action No. 24-cv-09673 v. OPINION WARDEN, et al., December 30, 2025 Respondents. SEMPER, District Judge. THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus of Petitioner Russel Tinsley (“Petitioner”), a civilly committed sex offender under New Jersey’s Sexually Violent Predator Act (“SVPA”), pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. (ECF No. 1.) Petitioner challenges his continued confinement by raising multiple grounds, including alleged bias in treatment reports,…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Miller-El v. CockrellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Mayle v. FelixSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Renico v. LettSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Kansas v. HendricksSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.