Legal Opinion

City of Cambridge v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 18, 1922PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C.J.

The city of Cambridge brings a suit in equity to restrain the Boston Elevated Railway Company from constructing its tracks in Third Street, a public highway within that city, and tracks connecting therewith. The Boston Elevated Railway Company brings a petition for a writ of mandamus to compel the superintendent of streets of the city of Cambridge *376to issue permits or licenses to the railway company to open, use, occupy and encumber parts of Third Street and certain other streets for the purpose of laying tracks and setting poles in accordance with a location granted to it by the department of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. City of Boston v. Treasurer & Receiver GeneralMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
  2. Cheney v. BarkerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
  3. Board of Survey v. Bay State Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
  4. Hyde v. Boston & Worcester Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
  5. City of Boston v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Neils v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Boston Elevated Railway Co. v. Metropolitan Transit AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1949
  3. Inhabitants of Southborough v. Boston & Worcester Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
  4. Town of Granby v. LandryMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1960
  5. Eastern Massachusetts Street Railway Co. v. Trustees of Eastern Massachusetts Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API