Legal Opinion
Menominee Indian Tribe of Wisconsin v. Lexington Insurance Company
District Court, N.D. California
Decided August 23, 2021No. 3:21-cv-00231Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 MENOMINEE INDIAN TRIBE OF Case No. 21-cv-00231-WHO WISCONSIN, et al., 8 Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING MOTIONS TO 9 DISMISS v. RE: DKT. NOS. 62, 64, 67, 68, 69, 70, 73, 10 106 LEXINGTON INSURANCE COMPANY, 11 et al., Defendants. 12 13 Plaintiffs Menominee Indian Tribe of Wisconsin, the Menominee Indian Gaming 14 Authority d/b/a Menominee Casino Resort (“MCR”), and the Wolf River Development 15 Company’s (collectively, “Menominee”) seek coverage from each defendant for the damages 16 Menominee sustained due to the COVID-19…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- In Re Gilead Sciences Securities LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Sterling Usher v. City of Los Angeles, Richard A. Gonzales, Michael E. Melton, Jose E. Ramirez, Joe Rios, and Robert L. VannCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.