Legal Opinion · Dissent

Herrera v. Beatrice Gallegos & Usagencies Casualty Insurance

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided October 28, 2015No. 14-CA-935Published

1DissentJohnson, J.

IJ, respectfully, dissent from the majority opinion on the basis that the trial court legally erred in considering a peremptory exception of prescription on its own objection. It is my opinion that the trial court completely disregarded the legislative intent of La. O.C.P. art. 927(B).

In Herrera v. Gallegos, 13-204 (La.App. 5 Cir. 10/9/13); 128 So.3d, 306, this Court reversed, the trial court’s sustaining of an exception- of prescription and remanded the matter for further proceedings. On remand, the matter proceeded to trial on October 8, 2014 without- any subsequent pleadings filed by…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Mathes v. SchwingLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1929
  2. Geiger v. State Ex Rel Dept. of HealthSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2002
  3. Russland Enterprises v. City of GretnaLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1999
  4. Herrera v. GallegosLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2013
  5. Adams v. GreferLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API