Legal Opinion

Robbins v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided December 9, 1992No. Nos. 797-92, 798-92 and 799-92PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON APPELLANT’S PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

CAMPBELL, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of kidnapping and aggravated sexual assault and his punishment was assessed by a jury at ten years and seventy-five years confinement, respectively. These convictions were affirmed. Robbins v. State, 827 S.W.2d 626 (Tex.App.—Beaumont, 1992).1 Appellant seeks discretionary review of the Court of Appeals’ holding that evidence of unadjudi-cated extraneous offenses was admissible in the punishment phase of trial.

During the punishment phase, the trial court admitted testimony from four witnesses…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Grunsfeld v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
  2. Robbins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1992

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hubbard v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1995
  2. Hoffman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1994
  3. Robbins v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)1993
  4. Hubbard v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1995
  5. Robbins v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API