Reynolds v. State

PRENDERGAST, Presiding Judge.

Appellant was convicted of cattle theft and his punishment fixed at two years confinement in the penitentiary,—the lowest prescribed by law.

By two bills appellant complains of error in the court not sustaining his challenge to two jurors because they had formed an opinion. The bills are too lengthy to copy. One gives in full the examination of the juror on his voir dire. . The effect of the other is shown by the bill. The statute prescribes the causes for which a juror may be challenged. C. C. P., art. 692. The substance of subdivision 13 of this article, is,…