Legal Opinion · Dissent

Metropolitan Life Insurance v. Harper

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided April 30, 1934No. 4-3427Published

1DissentSmith, J.

The judgment here appealed from should, in my opinion, be reversed.

I give fullest assent to the rule, many times applied by this court, that the verdict of a jury is conclusive of all disputed questions of fact, and, in recognition of the rule, agree that the disability of the insured has been established, althoug-h the physician who attended him expressed the opinion that the insured’s recovery was complete.

But, while the verdict of the jury concludes the question that the insured is permanently and totally disabled, the testimony of this doctor, substantiated by other testimony in the case,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Bergholm v. Peoria Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Aetna Life Insurance v. DunkenSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  3. Catlett v. Railway Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1893
  4. Ætna Life Insurance v. PhiferSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1923
  5. Travelers' Protective Assoc. of America v. StephensSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1932

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API