Legal Opinion
Staudigl v. Harper
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 11, 1946No. Civ. 15199PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWood, J.
Defendant appeals from the judgment entered in favor of plaintiff in this action in unlawful detainer.
The property here involved consists of a dwelling house and lot. In 1939 plaintiff and her former husband, Burgess Bell, purchased the lot and erected a house thereon which house they occupied until he died in 1940. Plaintiff was appointed administratrix of his estate and, upon her petition, the property here in question was distributed to her as community property on November 9, 1944.
On July 21, 1941, plaintiff and defendant entered into a written lease whereby plaintiff, in her individual…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Francis v. West Virginia Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1917
- Hicks v. ChristesonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Ludy v. ZumwaltCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
- Bauer v. NeuzilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- Seeburg v. El Royale Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1942
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Vella v. HudginsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- Claremont Terrace Homeowners' Ass'n v. United StatesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- Smyth v. Berman, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Foley v. CowanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- Swallers v. SwallersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.