High Tech Gays v. Defense Industrial Security Clearance Office
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BRUNETTI, Circuit Judge:
The plaintiffs-appellees challenge whether the Department of Defense’s (DoD) policy of subjecting all homosexual applicants for Secret and Top Secret clearances to expanded investigations and mandatory adjudications, and whether the alleged DoD policy and practice of refusing to grant security clearances to known or suspected gay applicants, violates the equal protection component of the Fifth Amendment’s Due Process Clause and the rights of free association guaranteed by the First Amendment. x
In analyzing the equal protection challenge, the district court concluded…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Brown v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Bolling v. SharpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Kerrigan v. Commissioner of Public HealthSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- Conaway v. DeaneCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
- Arnold J. Owens v. Local No. 169, Association of Western Pulp and Paper Workers, Third-Party-Defendant v. Itt Rayonier, Inc., Defendant-Third-Party-Plaintiff-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
- Arizona Dream Act Coalition v. BrewerDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2013
- Jackson v. AbercrombieDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2012
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.