Legal Opinion

Cota v. Rocheleau

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided May 6, 1958No. 323PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolden, J.

The plaintiff suffered personal injuries in a fall from a staging ejected by the defendant Orel Rocheleau in the home which he and the defendant Corinne Rocheleau own together in South Burlington. The authority of Orel Rocheleau to act for his codefendant is not questioned, and since he is directly involved, in the matters before us he is referred to as the defendant.

The defendant was formerly a building contractor. He had been engaged in this work for about twenty five years; first as a construction foreman and later in his own construction business. In connection with this work he acquired…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Tinney v. CrosbySupreme Court of Vermont · 1941
  2. Landing v. Town of FairleeSupreme Court of Vermont · 1941
  3. Anair v. Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Vermont · 1945
  4. Travers & Thomas v. RupeSupreme Court of Vermont · 1950
  5. Painter v. NicholsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1954

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Collins v. ThomasSupreme Court of Vermont · 2007
  2. Joseph L. LeClair v. Hector LeClairSupreme Court of Vermont · 2017
  3. Norton v. LumbraSupreme Court of Vermont · 1968
  4. Collins v. ThomasSupreme Court of Vermont · 2007
  5. Joseph L. LeClair v. Hector LeClairSupreme Court of Vermont · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API