Legal Opinion

Somers v. SAIF Corp.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 8, 1986No. WCB 82-11066; CA A33845PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtYoung, J.

Claimant seeks review of a Workers’ Compensation Board order reversing the referee and holding that claimant failed to prove that his myocardial infarction was compensable. On de novo review, we reverse.

Claimant is 48 years old. He has practiced law since 1962. In addition, he serves as municipal judge and a bankruptcy trustee. Before June, 1982, he had no known cardiovascular problems. On the morning of June 24, 1982, he was served with a default order in one of his estimated thirteen to fourteen hundred open case files. Investigation disclosed that the default had been taken approximately…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Coday v. WILLAMETTE TUG & BARGE COMPANYOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Hammons v. Perini Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
  3. Bush v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  4. Harris v. Farmers' Co-op CreameryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  5. Adams v. Gilbert Tow ServiceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. SAIF Corp. v. GaffkeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  2. Bluemer v. Southland IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  3. Winters v. Woodburn Carcraft Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  4. Asplundh Tree Expert Co. v. HartCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
  5. Palmer v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1986

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API