Legal Opinion

Rhodes v. State

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 19, 2007No. A07-148PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GILDEA, Justice.

The district court denied, without a hearing, appellant Thomas Daniel Rhodes’ petition for postconviction relief. Rhodes appeals to this court, arguing that the district court erred. We affirm.

The facts of this case are set forth in detail in State v. Rhodes, 627 N.W.2d 74 (Minn.2001) (Rhodes I), and State v. Rhodes, 657 N.W.2d 823 (Minn.2003) (Rhodes II). A jury found Rhodes guilty of premeditated first-degree murder, in violation of Minn.Stat. § 609.185(1) (1996), and intentional second-degree murder, in violation of Minn.Stat. § 609.19, subd. 1(1) (1996). The…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. House v. BellSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  2. State v. KnafflaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  3. State v. RhodesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
  4. Schleicher v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
  5. State v. RhodesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Gattis v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2008
  2. State v. HurdSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
  3. Thomas Daniel Rhodes v. State of Minnesota, A13-560Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2016
  4. Onyelobi v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2019
  5. Thomas Daniel Rhodes v. State of Minnesota, A13-560Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API