Legal Opinion

In the Interest of H. D. M.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 12, 2000No. A99A2498PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ellington, Judge.

Appellant, the father of H. D. M., appeals from the juvenile court’s order terminating his parental rights. Appellant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence, venue, and the juvenile court’s consideration of certain evidence. Finding no error, we affirm.

1. The standard of review applicable to appellant’s challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence is “whether after reviewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the appellee, any rational trier of fact could have found by clear and convincing evidence that the natural parent’s rights to custody have been lost.”…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. In the Interest of M. L. P.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
  2. In the Interest of A. C.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
  3. In the Interest of C. L. R.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
  4. In the Interest of L. H.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
  5. In the Interest of D. A. P.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1998

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. In the Interest of A. K.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
  2. In the Interest of L. G.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
  3. In the Interest of D. L. T. C.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
  4. In the Interest of J. D.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
  5. Bixby v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API