Legal Opinion

Bixby v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 12, 2002No. A01A2368, A01A2369PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Phipps, Judge.

Angela and Howard Bixby were tried by a jury and convicted of conspiracy to defraud the State and theft by taking. They appeal separately. In Case No. A01A2368, Angela Bixby claims that the trial court erred by (1) ruling that testimony by the Bixbys’ civil attorney on a limited matter would waive entirely the attorney-client privilege, (2) allowing two witnesses to offer opinions based on inadmissible hearsay and (3) allowing the State’s expert to express his opinion on the ultimate issue in the case. She also claims that her trial counsel was ineffective for failing to object…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Cook v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1986
  3. Stansell v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1998
  4. Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
  5. Whitner v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1992

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Ward v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
  2. Payne v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
  3. In the Interest of K. A. P.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
  4. Harris v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
  5. Mathis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API