Legal Opinion

St. Louis, B. & M. Ry. Co. v. Vick

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 19, 1919No. 6163PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Kleberg County; W. B. Hopkins, Judge. Action by V. J. Vick against Frank Andrews, as receiver of the St. Louis, Browns- ville & Mexico Railway Company, in which action the said Railway Company was by amendment made a defendant. From judgment for plaintiff, the Railway Company appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtMoursund, J.

V. J. Vick sued Frank Andrews, as receiver of the St. Louis, Brownsville & Mexico Railway Company, to recover damages for personal injuries which he sustained on February 9, 1914, while engaged as an employé of such receiver in carrying, with five coworkmen, a heavy end sill, alleging that while he was so engaged he slipped on a piece of carbon, or other obstructing material, and fell, and that such end sill fell on him. Negligence was charged in the following respects: (1) In failing to cause or permit said end sill to be carried on a push car or cart; (2) in causing or permitting an…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Black v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1899
  2. Probest v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1910
  3. Knight v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1912
  4. Palmo v. S. W. Slayden & Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Roundtree v. City of GalvestonTexas Supreme Court · 1874

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Stephenson v. NicholsTexas Commission of Appeals · 1926
  2. Foster v. BourgeoisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1923
  3. Texas Coca Cola Bottling Co. v. LovejoyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
  4. German v. Houston T. C. R. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1920
  5. Linthicum v. RichardsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API