Legal Opinion

Benson v. Sioux Falls Medical & Surgical Clinic

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 23, 1934No. File No. 7439PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoberts, P. J.

This is an action to recover for the alleged malpractice of the defendants. The plaintiff on May 13, 1929, while in the employ of the Northwestern Bell Telephone Company, met with an aocident and was taken, by the employer to the defendant Sioux Falls Medical and Surgical Clinic for treatment. The complaint alleges that plaintiff received- an injury to' his hack; that defendant Guy E. Van D'emark, a member of the defendant clinic, negligently examined the plaintiff anidl failed to discover the nature of the .injury; that defendant physician advised the plaintiff to continue .in his employment…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. O'Brien v. Chicago City Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Moeser v. ShunkSupreme Court of Kansas · 1924
  3. Viita v. FlemingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
  4. Booth & Flinn, Ltd. v. CookSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  5. Book v. City of HendersonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Bradshaw v. Iowa Methodist HospitalSupreme Court of Iowa · 1960
  2. Schumacher v. LeslieSupreme Court of Missouri · 1950
  3. Schumacher v. LeslieSupreme Court of Missouri · 1950
  4. State Ex Rel. Workmen's Compensation Fund v. E.W. Wylie Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Western Surety Co. v. AddySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1950

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API