Legal Opinion
State v. Brown
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
Decided November 2, 1993No. 9213SC1196PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EAGLES, Judge.
Defendant brings forward three assignments of error. We find no error and affirm.
Defendant first contends that the trial court erred in finding that defendant knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily waived his Miranda rights before making his confession at the police station. Prior to making his confession, defendant signed a “Juvenile Rights Warning” waiver form, which the trial court referred to in its order as “State’s Exhibit No. 1 for voir dire.” The following rights are listed on the form:
1. YOU HAVE THE RIGHT TO REMAIN SILENT.
2. ANYTHING YOU SAY CAN BE AND MAY BE USED…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Greer v. MorrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- State v. SimpsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
- State v. JacksonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- J. Gilliam v. Kenneth SealeyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2019
- In re M.A.C.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
- Jones v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1995
- State v. FlowersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
- State v. LeeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.