State v. Crocker
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Ness, Justice:
Appellant Crocker stabbed and killed his estranged wife in the presence of several eyewitnesses. The jury found him guilty of murder. We affirm.
Initially, appellant asserts the trial court erred in refusing to charge that the State must prove absence of the heat of passion beyond a reasonable doubt, citing Mullaney v. Wilbur, 421 U.S. 684, 95 S. Ct. 1881, 44 L. Ed. (2d) 508 (1975). We disagree.
Mullaney v. Wilbur challenged that Maine rule which required a defendant charged with murder to prove by the fair preponderance of the evidence that he acted in the hfeat of passion, in…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Mullaney v. WilburSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- State v. LevelleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1891
- State v. VaughnSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1977
- State v. BoltonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
- State v. FullerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1956
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Roach v. MartinCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1985
- State v. HymanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1981
- Roach v. MartinCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1985
- State v. GathersSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1988
- State v. GloverSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1985
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.