Legal Opinion

Hundley v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided January 15, 1937No. 8063PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

HOLMES, Circuit Judge.

Appellant is the widow of Ray Hundley, deceased, and his sole beneficiary under the Workmen’s Compensation Law of Texas (Rev.St.1925, art. 8306, as amended [Vernon’s Ann.Civ.St. art. 8306 et seq.]). At the time of his death, he was employed by the Continental Oil Company as a retail and wholesale distributor of its products over a large area, including Denton, Tex., where he was fatally burned by flames from gasoline. The trial court gave a peremptory instruction to the jury to return a verdict for appellee, on the ground that appellant had failed to show, as the law…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Mingus, Receiver v. WadleyTexas Supreme Court · 1926
  2. McNicol's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
  3. Lumberman's Reciprocal Ass'n. v. BehnkenTexas Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Ætna Life Ins. v. BurnettTexas Commission of Appeals · 1926
  5. Spooner v. Detroit Saturday Night Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1915

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Gombert v. London Guarantee & Accident Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API