Legal Opinion

At & T Universal Card Service v. Bermingham (In Re Bermingham)

United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Missouri

Decided October 9, 1996No. 19-50007PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

ARTHUR B. FEDERMAN, Bankruptcy Judge.

I. FACTUAL BACKGROUNDS

These four adversary proceedings all involve the dischargeability of credit card debt incurred by the four Chapter 7 debtors. They are further related by the fact that all four debtors and creditors negotiated a settlement prior to a trial on the merits and asked this Court to render a consent judgment in favor of the creditor. I take all four of the cases up in this consolidated opinion to demonstrate why I entered the consent judgment in two of the cases, refused to enter judgment in a third, and allowed the debtor…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Pioneer Investment Services Co. v. Brunswick Associates Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Local Number 93, International Ass'n of Firefighters v. City of ClevelandSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. In Re Bashir Y. Anastas, Debtor. Bashir Y. Anastas v. American Savings BankCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
  4. Hentschel v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
  5. Harbour v. Brown for UlrichTennessee Supreme Court · 1987

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. First Mutual Sales Finance v. Cacciatori (In Re Cacciatori)United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California · 2012
  2. MBNA America Bank, N.A. v. Panem (In Re Panem)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado · 2006
  3. Raymond G. CraytorUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API