Legal Opinion
La Maur, Inc. v. Revlon, Inc.
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided July 12, 1965No. 4-64 Civ. 65PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NORDBYE, District Judge.
Plaintiff seeks relief for an alleged infringement of its registered trademark STYLE, issued July 23,1963, which mark is used on hair spray and other products. There having been no showing for recovery either of punitive or compensatory damages, although requested in the complaint, the Court will consider in this decision only the relief sought by way of an injunction.
The challenged products are a hair spray denoted as STYLE and SET and a hair setting lotion termed SET & STYLE manufactured by defendant Revlon, Inc. The hair spray STYLE and SET was distributed in…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Queen Mfg. Co. v. Isaac Ginsberg & Bros.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1928
- F. W. Fitch Co. v. Camille, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1939
- Miles Laboratories, Inc. v. FrolichDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1961
- Clinton Detergent Company v. The Procter & Gamble CompanyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1962
- L. J. Mueller Furnace Co. v. United Conditioning Corp.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1955
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Squirtco, Cross-Appellee v. The Seven-Up Company, a Missouri Corporation and Seven-Up U.S.A., Inc., a Missouri Corporation, Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980
- Aveda Corp. v. Evita Marketing, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1989
- Clairol Incorporated v. Gillette CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1967
- Robert Bruce, Inc. v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1972
- Phoenix Manufacturing Co. v. Plymouth Mfg. Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1968
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.