Legal Opinion

Nolan v. Smith (In Re Smith)

United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado

Decided March 25, 2012No. 19-10666PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

MICHAEL E. ROMERO, Bankruptcy Judge.

THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment and Defendants’ Response thereto. The Court, having reviewed the file, including the supplemental authority in support of the motion, having heard arguments of counsel and being otherwise advised in the premises, grants the Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment based on the following discussion.

Procedural Background

Louis and Shawna Nolan (the “Nolans”) and Christopher and Donna James (the “James”) (jointly the…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
  3. Grogan v. GarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Kawaauhau v. GeigerSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  5. Cohen v. De La CruzSupreme Court of the United States · 1998

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Suarez v. Barrett (In Re Suarez)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  2. Jan S. Weinstein & Associates, Ltd. v. Lymberopoulos (In Re Lymberopoulos)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2011
  3. Enigami Systems, Inc. v. Baca (In re Baca)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado · 2014
  4. In re: Brian John Phillips and Amanda Elizabeth PhillipsUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado · 2026
  5. Matthews, Jr. v. GamboaUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2020

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API