Legal Opinion
Azar v. Garza
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided June 4, 2018No. 17-654PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*1791 PER CURIAM.
Jane Doe, a minor, was eight weeks pregnant when she unlawfully crossed the border into the United States. She was detained and placed into the custody of the Office of Refugee Resettlement (ORR), part of the Department of Health and Human Services. ORR placed her in a federally funded shelter in Texas. After an initial medical examination, Doe requested an abortion. But ORR did not allow Doe to go to an abortion clinic. Absent "emergency medical situations," ORR policy prohibits shelter personnel from "taking any action that facilitates an abortion without direction and approval…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Arizonans for Official English v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- United States v. Munsingwear, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- U.S. Bancorp Mortgage Co. v. Bonner Mall PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- United States v. Hamburg-Amerikanische Packetfahrt-Actien GesellschaftSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- J.D. v. Alex Azar, IICourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019
- Watermark Senior Living Ret. Cmtys., Inc. v. Morrison Mgmt. Specialists, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018
- In Re: Leslie Rutledge v.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2020
- Tanner Hirschfeld v. Bureau of Alcohol, Firearms, TCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2021
- Hassoun v. SearlsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2020
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.