In re Meade Land & Development Co.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
JAMES HUNTER, III, Circuit Judge:
In its petition for rehearing before this court in banc,1 Massey-Ferguson has, inter alia, reiterated the contention made before the panel that the trial court erred in its allocation of peremptory strikes between the parties. Massey-Ferguson points to this court’s decision in Blount v. Plovidba, 567 F.2d 583 (3d Cir. 1977), in which the panel held (Hunter, J., dissenting) that 28 U.S.C. § 1870, the statute providing for jury challenges, does not permit a trial judge to grant more than three peremptory challenges to each party in a single plaintiff-single…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Carl Blount v. Jugoslavenska Linijska PlovidbaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
- Smith v. Pressed Steel Tank Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1975
- Carey v. Lykes Bros. SteamshipCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
- Moore v. South African Marine Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
- Smith v. Pressed Steel Tank CoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
3Cited by3 opinions
- In Re Nation/Ruskin, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1982
- In the Matter of Meade Land and Development Co., Inc., Bankrupt. Appeal of Eastgate Enterprises, Inc., CreditorCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
- Matter of DooleyUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia · 1984