State v. Newton
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
ARNOLD, Judge.
Defendant first contends that the trial court erred in admitting evidence of transactions on 30 May 1974 involving James Mann, Officer Sanders and defendant. We disagree. Evidence of other offenses is admissible when, as in the case at bar, it tends to show guilty knowledge on the part of defendant or a plan “embracing the commission of a series of crimes. . . . ” State v. McClain, 240 N.C. 171, 175-76, 81 S.E. 2d 364, 367 (1954). See also 1 Stansbury, N. C. Evidence (Brandis rev.), §§ 91, 92. Furthermore, the trial court specifically instructed the jury as to the limited…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. McClainSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- State v. BeachSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
- State v. HortonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
- State v. . ShookSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
- State v. . WarrenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. AshleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
- State v. MayCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979