Legal Opinion

Canario v. Culhane, 91-5526 (1998)

Superior Court of Rhode Island

Decided May 8, 1998No. C.A. No. 91-5526Published

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION

Before this Court is plaintiff Raymond Canario's motion for a new trial. In his motion, the plaintiff asserts that this Court erroneously reviewed the denial of the plaintiff's application for a disability pension by employing an arbitrary and capricious review standard instead of a de novo standard.

On January 15, 1998, this Court issued a decision in the instant case, affirming defendant Colonel Culhane's decision not to award the plaintiff a disability pension. The pertinent facts of the instant matter are contained in that decision. The plaintiff subsequently filed the instant…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. De Nobel v. Vitro Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1989
  3. Carmody v. Rhode Island Conflict of Interest CommissionSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1986
  4. Ralph Block v. Pitney Bowes Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1992
  5. Recupero v. New England Telephone & Telegraph Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API