Canario v. Culhane, 91-5526 (1998)
Superior Court of Rhode Island
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION
Before this Court is plaintiff Raymond Canario's motion for a new trial. In his motion, the plaintiff asserts that this Court erroneously reviewed the denial of the plaintiff's application for a disability pension by employing an arbitrary and capricious review standard instead of a de novo standard.
On January 15, 1998, this Court issued a decision in the instant case, affirming defendant Colonel Culhane's decision not to award the plaintiff a disability pension. The pertinent facts of the instant matter are contained in that decision. The plaintiff subsequently filed the instant…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- De Nobel v. Vitro Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1989
- Carmody v. Rhode Island Conflict of Interest CommissionSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1986
- Ralph Block v. Pitney Bowes Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1992
- Recupero v. New England Telephone & Telegraph Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.