State of Missouri v. Kraig J. Walker
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtGary D. Witt, Judge
The State brings this interlocutory appeal, challenging the.trial court’s grant of Kraig J. Walker’s (“Walker”) motion to suppress physical evidence relating to possession of a controlled substance with intent to distribute. The State argues that the trial court erred in granting Walker’s motion to suppress the evidence because the search of Walker’s vehicle was justified under the “automobile exception” to the warrant requirement. The trial court found that the evidence should be suppressed under its analysis of the “search incident to arrest” warrant exception. However, because the State…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Arizona v. GantSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- State v. MilliornSupreme Court of Missouri · 1990
- State v. StoverSupreme Court of Missouri · 2012
- State v. SchroederSupreme Court of Missouri · 2011
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. DonovanMissouri Court of Appeals · 2017
- State of Missouri v. Christopher P. HumbleMissouri Court of Appeals · 2015
- State v. WestMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
- State of Missouri v. Lonny Leroy MaysMissouri Court of Appeals · 2016
- State of Missouri v. Douglas BeesonMissouri Court of Appeals · 2025