Legal Opinion

Cutler v. Kbr Luxury, Inc.

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided June 10, 2024No. Civil Action No. 2023-2377Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA SETH CUTLER, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action No. 23-2377 KBR LUXURY, INC., Judge Beryl A. Howell Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiffs Seth Cutler and Raffaele Viglianti contracted with defendant KBR Luxury, Inc., to perform construction and renovation work on a residential townhome plaintiffs own in Washington, D.C., for which work plaintiffs allegedly paid, in total over $96,000. Compl. ¶¶ 6– 7, 15, ECF No. 1. Fifty-seven weeks after the project began, plaintiffs served defendant with a demand letter insisting on return of the…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. King v. BurwellSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
  3. Wood v. MossSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
  4. Banneker Ventures, LLC v. Jim GrahamCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2015
  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. SW Gen., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2017

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API