Goldman v. Blanksten
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Taylor
The complainants, Aaron Goldman and Dorothy Goldman, having signed a contract for the purchase of certain real estate, and paid $4,000 as earnest money, and having discovered, as it is claimed, that the contract was brought about by the fraud of the defendants, filed an original bill of complaint, then an amended bill, asking that the contract be declared null and void, that the earnest money be returned to them, and that the defendants, the Kolkeys, be restrained from prosecuting a pending suit at law against the complainants for an alleged breach of the same contract. A general demurrer was…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Wheeler v. . ReynoldsNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
- Becker v. BillingsIllinois Supreme Court · 1922
- McHenry v. . HazardNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
- Murray v. TolmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1896
- Whitney v. RobertsIllinois Supreme Court · 1859
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Village of Hartford v. First National BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1940