Legal Opinion

Younglas v. City of Flint

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 14, 1956No. Docket 31, Calendar 46,590PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDethmers, C. J.

Plaintiffs, as taxpayers of defendant city, seek to enjoin defendants from conveying, without consideration therefor, city property, used as a public park, to the United States govern*578ment' as a site for a reserve armory school. After hearing on a show canse order and on the merits a decree entered denying injunctive relief and dismissing plaintiffs’ bill of complaint. They appeal.

Plaintiffs urge, as controlling, Michigan Constitution of. 1908, art 8, § 25, which reads, in part:

“No city or village shall have power * * * to loan'its credit, nor to assess, levy or collect any tax or assessment…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hays v. City of KalamazooMichigan Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Detroit Museum of Art v. EngelMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Attorney General v. Board of SupervisorsMichigan Supreme Court · 1876

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Robinson v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Alan v. Wayne CountyMichigan Supreme Court · 1972
  3. City of Gaylord v. Gaylord City ClerkMichigan Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Kestenbaum v. Michigan State UniversityMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Gregory Marina, Inc. v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1966

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API