Legal Opinion · Dissent

Detroit Museum of Art v. Engel

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 23, 1915No. Calendar No. 26,570PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Certiorari to Wayne; Van Zile, J. Mandamus by the Detroit Museum of Art and another against George Engel, controller of the city of Detroit, to compel respondent to sign a voucher to pay the salary of the acting director of relator from public funds. An order granting the writ is reviewed by respondent on certiorari:

1DissentMoore, J.

In the spring of 1885, 40 residents of the city of Detroit, each of whom had contributed $1,000, organized the Detroit Museum of Art. That organization was made under Act No. 3 Pub. Acts 1885, entitled “An act for the formation of corporations for the cultivation of art.” Some of the provisions of the act read:

“Such corporations shall have power to acquire and hold such real estate as is suitable for the site of such art buildings as it may erect or maintain thereon, to receive and use such gifts, contributions, devises, and bequests as may be made to it for art purposes; to receive, acquire,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Detroit & Howell Railroad v. Township BoardMichigan Supreme Court · 1870
  2. Cole v. La GrangeSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  3. People ex rel. Bay City v. State TreasurerMichigan Supreme Court · 1871
  4. St. Mary's Industrial School for Boys v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1876
  5. State ex rel. Garth v. SwitzlerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1898

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Alan v. Wayne CountyMichigan Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Veterans of Foreign Wars v. ChildersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946
  3. Hays v. City of KalamazooMichigan Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Younglas v. City of FlintMichigan Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Connor v. HerrickMichigan Supreme Court · 1957

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API