Legal Opinion

Curry v. Atlantic Mutual Insurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 2, 2001PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs and judgment granted in accordance with the following Memorandum: Supreme Court erred in denying the motion of defendant to the extent that it sought summary judg*938ment declaring that it is not obligated to defend or indemnify Leo Heaps in plaintiffs’ underlying actions against Heaps and Herbert Roman, individually and d/b/a Herbert Roman Galleries, and Herbert Roman, Inc. (collectively Roman). Defendant had issued a commercial general liability policy to Roman, which covered employees for acts within the scope of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In re Ted Is Back Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. In re 12 Cornelia Street, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. Town of Harrison v. National Union Fire InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
  4. Curry v. RomanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. DRYDEN MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. GOESSL, STANLEYAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  2. Dryden Mutual Insurance v. GoesslAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  3. Dryden Mutual Insurance v. GoesslAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API