Laconia Water Co. v. Laconia
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtKenison, C. J.
Revised Laws, chapter 56, section 4 provides that the two-thirds vote of a city council to acquire a municipal water works must be “confirmed by a majority of the qualified voters at a regular election or at a special meeting duly warned in either case . ... ” The issue in this case is whether the vote at the special meeting of June 22, 1954, at which a majority of those voting, but less than a majority of those qualified to vote, was a confirming vote within the meaning of R. L., c. 56, s. 4. This is a problem of statutory construction bearing upon the legality of a proposed expenditure of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Carroll County v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- County of Cass v. JohnstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Knox County v. Ninth National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Munce v. O'HaraSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
- Cashman v. City Clerk of SalemMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
3Cited by7 opinions
- SCHOOL DISTRICTS NOS. 2, 3, 6, 9, AND 10 v. CookWyoming Supreme Court · 1967
- Byron v. Timberlane Regional School DistrictSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1973
- Kuhrt v. Sully County Board of EducationSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1970
- Kuhrt v. Sully County Board of EducationSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1970
- SCHOOL DISTRICTS NOS. 2, 3, 6, 9, AND 10 v. CookWyoming Supreme Court · 1967
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.