Legal Opinion
Kuhrt v. Sully County Board of Education
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided April 14, 1970No. File 10722PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROBERTS, Presiding Judge.
The question involved on this appeal is whether a statutory requirement of a majority of the electors in a school district or districts for approval of a plan to create a superimposed high school district contemplates a majority of the votes cast or of the entire electorate.
SDCL 13-6 governs school district reorganization. The statutory provisions which apply to the question before us are as follows:
“13-6-50. Approval required for creation of high school district — Issuance and distribution of superintendent’s order. — In elections for the creation of superimposed…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Carroll County v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- SCHOOL DISTRICTS NOS. 2, 3, 6, 9, AND 10 v. CookWyoming Supreme Court · 1967
- Elfring v. PatersonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1939
- Munce v. O'HaraSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
- Taylor v. McFaddenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1892
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Olsen v. City of SpearfishSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1980
- Kuhrt v. Sully County Board of EducationSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1970