Legal Opinion

Pacific Surety Co. v. Toye

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 16, 1916PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDe Courcy, J.

In September, 1910, the defendant, an attorney at law, induced the plaintiff to become surety on the bond of his client, one Hazel Mills, to prosecute an appeal from a judgment rendered against her in the Municipal Court of the City of Boston. The instrument containing the application and agreement to indemnify the said surety company was signed by the defendant, and a premium of $5 was paid upon the issuing of the appeal bond. The case was still pending in the Superior Court, and the bond was in full force, when this action was brought to recover four unpaid annual premiums.

The presiding…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Clark v. HigginsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1882

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Nusbaum v. Hartford Fire Ins.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  2. Heidlebaugh v. MillerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  3. Lynn Tucker Sales, Inc. v. LeBlancMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1949
  4. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad v. Preferred Underwriters, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API