Legal Opinion

In re Mardenfeld

District Court, N.D. New York

Decided March 26, 1919PublishedCited by 2 opinions

In Bankruptcy. In the matter of Louis Mardenfeld, an individual,, trading as Mardenfeld & Grossman, bankrupt. Motion to confirm the report of Hon. James A. Van Voast, as special master,, and return of order to show cause why the above-named bankrupt, Louis Mardenfeld, should not bo punished for contempt for neglecting ana failing on demand to pay over to Tilomas 1!. Tillott, trustee in the above-entitled matter, the sum of $1,328.13, money of the bankrupt in his hands on the…

Read the full summary

In Bankruptcy. In the matter of Louis Mardenfeld, an individual,, trading as Mardenfeld & Grossman, bankrupt. Motion to confirm the report of Hon. James A. Van Voast, as special master,, and return of order to show cause why the above-named bankrupt, Louis Mardenfeld, should not bo punished for contempt for neglecting ana failing on demand to pay over to Tilomas 1!. Tillott, trustee in the above-entitled matter, the sum of $1,328.13, money of the bankrupt in his hands on the day the petition in bankruptcy was filed, and which sum he proceeded to spend in paying certain claims, paying his…

1Opinion of the CourtRay, District Judge

(after stating the facts as above).. The facts in this case are not involved. A short time, before the involuntary petition in bankruptcy was filed the now bankrupt had a fire in his store at Gloversville, N. Y., and there came due him from the insurance company for loss on account thereof over $3,600. He was also running a store in Schenectady, N. Y., in which he had a small stock of goods, worth $1,400. It would seem he was having some talk with certain of his creditors as to a composition, as he had had communication with a lawyer in New York City named David Geiger, who represented some…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Mueller v. NugentSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  2. United States v. ShippSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  3. Bank v. ShermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  4. Merrimack River Savings Bank v. City of Clay CenterSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  5. Clay v. WatersCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1910

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lineker v. DillonDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1921
  2. Wakefield v. HouselCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API