Legal Opinion

Matter of Cannon

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 8, 1915No. Crim. No. 292PublishedCited by 7 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Sau Joaquin County. C. W. Norton, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the. court.

1Opinion of the CourtChipman, P. J.

Petitioner, H. T. Cannon, father of the above-named persons, all of whom are minors, seeks to set aside a judgment of the juvenile court of San Joaquin County, duly made and entered October 1, 1913, adjudging them to be neglected persons.

The court denied the petition in so far as the custody and care of the female children are concerned but granted the petition as to the two boys, Frank and George, on condition that said Cannon first “convince the court of his wish and intention in good faith to provide for the support of the said sons by paying to Albert Eckstrom, the registrar of Associated…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Matter of CozzaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In Re ContrerasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  2. In Re BiggsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  3. State in Interest of K____ B____Utah Supreme Court · 1958
  4. In Re PierceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  5. In Re DevoreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API