Legal Opinion
United States v. Bernard John Hinderman
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided July 15, 1980No. 79-1342PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Per curiam
After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this three-judge panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material assistance in the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R. App.P. 34(a); Tenth Cir. R. 10(e). This cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
Bernard John Hinderman appeals from his conviction for willfully supplying false information to his employer on a withholding exemption certificate in violation of I.R.C. § 7205, 26 U.S.C. § 7205. Proceeding on appeal pro se as he did at trial, Hinder-man makes various assertions that we think…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. PomponioSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Earl R. Cephus v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1963
- United States v. John Paul MalinowskiCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973
- United States v. James Walter ScottCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- United States v. William SisackCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- United States v. John Charles BlankenshipCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
- State v. BrigandiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- State v. GreeneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- United States v. William S. Lawson, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1982
- State v. AllenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.