Legal Opinion
United States v. William Sisack
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 26, 1976No. 75--1521PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Before WRIGHT and CHOY, Circuit Judges, and TAYLOR, * Senior District Judge. EUGENE A. WRIGHT, Circuit Judge:
On his appeal from a conviction by a jury on five counts of giving false testimony before a grand jury [18 U.S.C. § 1623], Sisack argues (1) that the government failed to prove that the grand jury which called appellant to testify was investigating matters properly before á federal grand jury, (2) that the government failed to prove that his statements before the grand jury were material to its investigation and (3) that the prosecution witnesses were so lacking in credibility…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. Clarence E. BraaschCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1974
- Robert Lewis Eason and Kenneth Lamoyne Nowlin v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
- United States v. Carl E. Koonce, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1973
- Leo Vitello v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
- United States v. James Melvin WilcoxCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- United States v. Michael E. GaudinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- State v. BrigandiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- United States v. Marvin Jose RamirezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- In the Matter of a Grand Jury Subpoena Directed to Marc Rich & Co., A.G. Marc Rich & Co., A.G., a Swiss Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- United States v. Melvin A. Slawik, and Bruce A. UffelmanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.