Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Williams-Sonoma Song-Beverly Act Cases

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 30, 2019No. A154692Published

1Opinion of the Court

Filed 9/30/19 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE A154692 WILLIAMS-SONOMA SONG- BEVERLY ACT CASES. (City & County of San Francisco JCCP No. 4611) The Song-Beverly Credit Card Act of 1971 (Civ. Code, § 1747 et seq. (the Act)) makes it unlawful for merchants to request or require customers to provide “personal identification information” as a condition to accepting a credit card for payment. In Harrold v. Levi Strauss & Co. (2015)

236 Cal.App.4th 1259

(Harrold), we held the Act does not prohibit merchants from…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Brinker Restaurant Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Sav-On Drug Stores, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  4. Pineda v. Williams-Sonoma Stores, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Steroid Hormone Product CasesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API